communicating in these multiple streams I sometimes lose track of what I have and haven’t responded to – which is the reason why only now I respond to your comment here. Somehow I do have the feeling that I did so before, uncanny – I even have some of what I said in mind… that, yes, I feel very much connected with the shamanic tradition in that work (which, by the way I haven’t had the chance to do much of in recent 2-3 years, immersing myself in so many different fields).
This doesn’t come from a shamanic tradition, though, it is very modern in its genesis using rock, pop and other very modern music… and silence, of course.

At present I’m pursuing the same ‘energies’ in less spectacular, almost day to day settings.

Thank you very much for your response,
Mushin

I’ve read Dean Radins book as soon as it appeared on the market as it it gives a very interesting hard science look on the phenomena we can encounter in work like “Dynamic Presencing” and also the Circle of the Heart work where a Circle Being appears at times, an encompassing intelligence formed of (and maybe by) the Circle.
Nevertheless this type of thinking is still married to the thought that there is a kind of separate subject, an encapsuled singularity that – like electrons, atoms and nowadays molecules – can be entangled, whereas in my thinking I tend more and more towards understanding that it is the greater whole (humanity in our case, and then sub-wholes…) that has a very determining influence on its members (or the sum)

Actually right now I’m going to write a new blogpost about just that…

Looking forward to our conversation that, I’m sure, we’ll soon have.